503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.75%
Similar revenue growth to ORCL's 24.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
17.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 5.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
20.01%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ORCL's 28.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.21%
Margin expansion below 50% of ORCL's 3.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.51%
Similar operating expenses growth to ORCL's 24.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
20.82%
Similar total costs growth to ORCL's 20.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.91%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 10.60%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
20.39%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ORCL's 42.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.95%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.93%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 58.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.52%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 27.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.24%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.54%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ORCL's 59.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.85%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 28.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.60%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 40.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.51%
Net income growth below 50% of ORCL's 71.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.88%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 37.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.00%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.81%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.81%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.