PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.37%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
50.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 20.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.34%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.39%
R&D growth above 1.5x ORCL's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.55%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.11%
Total costs growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
D&A growth less than half of ORCL's 10.64%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
29.93%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.08%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
313.33%
Similar other expenses growth to ORCL's 303.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
40.77%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.19%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.40%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.60%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.03%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.86%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.86%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.29%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 22.66% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-5.29%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 21.73% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.