PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.46%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 5.49%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-57.94%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 12.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.03%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 3.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.54%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.29%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.52%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.56%
Total costs growth less than half of ORCL's 4.95%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.31%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 0.66%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
11.46%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 6.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.60%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.53%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 7.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.37%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 6.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 1.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.58%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 6.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.26%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 6.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.70%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 1.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.62%
Share count increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.62%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.