PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.77%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.28%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.27%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.49%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.64%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.19%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.60%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 5.00%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
11.53%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.97%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.36%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.42%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.00%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 159.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.88%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.97%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.84%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.92%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.27%
Share count increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.70%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.