PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.70%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 4.67%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
24.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 6.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
19.42%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.44%
R&D growth 50-75% of ORCL's 2.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.28%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 2.20%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.56%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ORCL's 3.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.00%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36.82%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 7.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.57%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 13.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
45.05%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.18%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-40.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
40.61%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.60%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.62%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.48%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.67%
EPS change of 46.67% while ORCL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
33.33%
Diluted EPS change of 33.33% while ORCL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-4.64%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.90%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.