PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.96%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
612.12%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-5.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.06%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.20%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.88%
Total costs growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.15%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.27%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.16%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
155.15%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 49.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
19.88%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.21%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.18%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.02%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.17%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.43%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.01%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 1.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.