PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.65%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-23.18%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
4.46%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.15%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-8.08%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.86%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.62%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.53%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.43%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of ORCL's 119.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.63%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.33%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.19%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.51%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.20%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.33%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.55%
Share count increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.56%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 5.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.