PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.41%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.60%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.86%
Margin expansion below 50% of ORCL's 1.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.11%
R&D growth less than half of ORCL's 10.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.83%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.17%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.83%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.09%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.03%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
41.09%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.93%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.93%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.93%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.14%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.37%
Share count increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.15%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.