PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.11%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 27.58%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.94%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 16.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.60%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ORCL's 31.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.49%
Margin expansion below 50% of ORCL's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.07%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 8.39%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.95%
Similar total costs growth to ORCL's 11.52%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.57%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 78.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-1.97%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 59.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
37.21%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of ORCL's 62.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-12.86%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 57.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.95%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 23.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-186.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-44.29%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 27.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.25%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 24.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.30%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 29.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.36%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 1.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.00%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.72%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.