PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.80%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
8.79%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.86%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.60%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 1.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.06%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.74%
Total costs growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.96%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.10%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-29.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.36%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.95%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 74.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
35.84%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.20%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.11%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.84%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.32%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.71%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.15%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.83%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.05%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.