PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.86%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.55%
Cost increase while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-1.35%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.58%
R&D change of 20.58% while ORCL maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.59%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.71%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.43%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.68%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.55%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.93%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 1500.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
36.07%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.58%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.05%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.07%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.43%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.43%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.74%
Share count increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.37%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ORCL's 1.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.