PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.07%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 7.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.08%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 21.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.18%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 3.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.38%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.94%
R&D growth less than half of ORCL's 25.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
128.01%
G&A change of 128.01% while ORCL maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-2.24%
Marketing expense reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.83%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ORCL's 26.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.66%
Total costs growth less than half of ORCL's 24.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.11%
Similar D&A growth to ORCL's 157.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-29.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18.10%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-25.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.13%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.23%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.