503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.52%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 18.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
78.69%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 4.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.08%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ORCL's 23.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-6.95%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 4.23% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.02%
R&D growth less than half of ORCL's 17.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-32.69%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
38.25%
Marketing expense change of 38.25% while ORCL maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.23%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x ORCL's 9.66%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
26.08%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 7.88%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.28%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.10%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ORCL's 37.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.88%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 11.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 56.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.28%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ORCL's 53.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 28.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.17%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 51.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.30%
Net income growth below 50% of ORCL's 53.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.29%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 29.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.69%
EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 50.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.24%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 50.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.27%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.24%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.