503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.29%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 39.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.03%
Cost growth less than half of ORCL's 22.03%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.04%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ORCL's 45.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.69%
Margin expansion below 50% of ORCL's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.09%
Similar R&D growth to ORCL's 14.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 180.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ORCL shows 220.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ORCL's 29.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
12.99%
Total costs growth less than half of ORCL's 27.09%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.46%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 24.53%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ORCL's 56.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.64%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 10.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.18%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 76.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 26.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.32%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 74.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 24.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.88%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 84.98%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.01%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 69.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.28%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 21.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 78.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.11%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.