PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.41%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-20.38%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 1.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.78%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.88%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.03%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.89%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-20.02%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.02%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.41%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.28%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.87%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.40%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.39%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.26%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.30%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.98%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.28%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.55%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.27%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 1.73% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.