503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.13%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 32.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
51.26%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 12.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.33%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 38.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.98%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 4.50% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.31%
R&D growth above 1.5x ORCL's 5.09%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 8.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ORCL shows 31.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 19.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
20.14%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x ORCL's 17.31%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 13.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-39.46%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 54.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.23%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 21.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.46%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 63.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.81%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 23.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.55%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 61.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 21.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 76.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.39%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 55.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.66%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 17.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.25%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 55.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 55.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.26%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.