PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.92%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-17.36%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.40%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.30%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.70%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 8.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.88%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.39%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 10.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
48.36%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.09%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.36%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.14%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.02%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.10%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.98%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
54.28%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.32%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.30%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.75%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.16%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.32%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 2.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.