PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.37%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
9.90%
Cost increase while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-4.14%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.19%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-47.03%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-12.59%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.73%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.66%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.42%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.58%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.04%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.57%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.37%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.00%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.16%
Share count reduction below 50% of ORCL's 0.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.08%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.