PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.97%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.45%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.48%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.55%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 3.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.08%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-22.10%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.66%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.66%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.31%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.63%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.84%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.28%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 46.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.02%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.86%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.85%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.74%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.59%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.15%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.57%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.15%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.12% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 1.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.