PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.20%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 14.40%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
53.97%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 4.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.81%
Similar gross profit growth to ORCL's 18.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-6.00%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 3.24% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.50%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 1.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
0.75%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
36.32%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 14.78%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 3.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
29.84%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
60.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 9.18%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-4.47%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.85%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ORCL's 32.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.58%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 14.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.74%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 44.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.87%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 26.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
191.23%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.52%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ORCL's 47.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.61%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 28.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.36%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 75.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.62%
Net income growth 50-75% of ORCL's 38.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.47%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 20.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
23.81%
EPS growth 50-75% of ORCL's 37.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
24.19%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ORCL's 37.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.36%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.44%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.