PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.51%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.90%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.31%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.43%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
43.25%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-11.95%
Marketing expense reduction while ORCL shows 1.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-142.42%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.21%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 3.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.90%
Total costs reduction while ORCL shows 0.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.81%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of ORCL's 5.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.73%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-1.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.78%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.58%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-800.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.13%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.