503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.03%
Similar cost growth to ORCL's 22.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-8.97%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 22.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.25%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 0.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.42%
Similar R&D growth to ORCL's 5.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-26.93%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 5.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
11.44%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 7.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
231.25%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 123.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1.62%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 4.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.09%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.95%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-6.65%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 3.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.31%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 36.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.10%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 11.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.22%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 40.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.84%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 14.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
900.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 115.41%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.18%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 56.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 27.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.77%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 74.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.00%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 52.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.56%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 24.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 52.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 55.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.15%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.