PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.87%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.16%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.37%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.54%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-19.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-21.85%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-11.78%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.67%
Interest expense reduction while ORCL shows 3.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.95%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 3.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.08%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.48%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.30%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.99%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.28%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
5.62%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.41%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.78%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.08%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.07%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.