PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.33%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 10.79%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
61.75%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 5.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.02%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 12.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.55%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 1.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.69%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 1.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.27%
G&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 0.77%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
29.63%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 15.86%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-238.75%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 228.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
16.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 7.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
35.71%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 6.45%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.41%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 5.99%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
32.18%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.04%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of ORCL's 15.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-6.47%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 4.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.81%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 18.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-4.92%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 6.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-222.97%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.94%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 20.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-7.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 8.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 37.71%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
25.06%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 16.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.49%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.40%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 16.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.81%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 19.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.46%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.