PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.79%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 0.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-28.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-10.94%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 0.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.03%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.18%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 0.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2.59%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-17.30%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
35.14%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.44%
Operating expenses reduction while ORCL shows 0.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.86%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
29.63%
Interest expense growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.49%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 2.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.50%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 2.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.49%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 3.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.17%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 3.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
81.32%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.69%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 1.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.12%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.74%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 5.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.69%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 0.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.72%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-13.92%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 1.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.82%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.50%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.