PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.77%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
8.93%
Cost increase while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.44%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-16.17%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 4.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-20.38%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
46.97%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.45%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.31%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.73%
Interest expense reduction while ORCL shows 8.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.03%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.90%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.26%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 23.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.79%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.04%
Share count reduction below 50% of ORCL's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.07%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.