503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-29.35%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 0.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.65%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.79%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-14.04%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
87.08%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 344.44%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-6.39%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
30.25%
Interest expense growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.39%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.99%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.30%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-204.05%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 14.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.13%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-22.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.58%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 2.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-14.08%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.08%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.74%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.72%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.