PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.08%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 14.79%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.29%
Cost growth 50-75% of ORCL's 8.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ORCL's 16.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 1.50% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.69%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x ORCL's 3.33%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
16.59%
G&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 10.32%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
6.79%
Marketing expense growth less than half of ORCL's 20.28%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
114.81%
Other expenses change of 114.81% while ORCL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.98%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 15.74%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.69%
Total costs growth less than half of ORCL's 13.30%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
17.06%
Similar interest expense growth to ORCL's 19.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-1.45%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 5.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-100.19%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 20.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.65%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 5.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.13%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 22.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.50%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 6.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
485.71%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-126.94%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 17.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 2.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.07%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 43.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-164.09%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 10.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-162.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.57%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.57%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 10.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.