PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.12%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-3.49%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-10.47%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-14.78%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-15.85%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2425.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.38%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.65%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.81%
Interest expense growth less than half of ORCL's 15.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.14%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 1.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36306.25%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
382.17%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
407.11%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-194.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
413.95%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
441.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-57.54%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
253.43%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
266.99%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.50%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.50%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.29%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.