503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 6.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
36.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.71%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ORCL's 8.21%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-9.47%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 1.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.09%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 2.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.24%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 10.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
18.81%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 12.36%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
84.95%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 180.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 4.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
21.83%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 3.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.10%
Interest expense growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.02%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of ORCL's 7.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-9.64%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 1.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 9.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.92%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.93%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 16.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.20%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ORCL's 15.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 8.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.99%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.37%
Net income growth below 50% of ORCL's 25.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.33%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 18.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.28%
EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 30.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.64%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 27.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.40%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.41%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.