503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 17.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.33%
Cost growth 50-75% of ORCL's 5.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-1.36%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 20.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.76%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 2.68% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.57%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
14.12%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x ORCL's 11.38%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
17.38%
Similar marketing expense growth to ORCL's 21.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
20.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 93.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.21%
Similar operating expenses growth to ORCL's 11.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.71%
Similar total costs growth to ORCL's 9.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
1.47%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 0.56%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
11.89%
D&A growth less than half of ORCL's 168.97%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
6.04%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ORCL's 47.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.03%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 25.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.70%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 31.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.93%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 11.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
208.10%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 20.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-33.54%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 36.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 16.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.42%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 55.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.88%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 31.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.21%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 11.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.02%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.