PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.37%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.69%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
11.47%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.79%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.27%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 49.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.68%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-19.51%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
61.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 17.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-12.74%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.37%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
26.67%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 14.92%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
52.28%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.09%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
118.02%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.96%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-58.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
103.97%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.75%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
415.56%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
81.52%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.64%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.50%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.68%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.67%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.