PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 5.12%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
26.22%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 6.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.99%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 0.98% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.42%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-15.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
26.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1046.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.01%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.22%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 8.41%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
19.27%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 12.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-1.30%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 7.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.72%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 14.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.05%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 9.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.46%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.50%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 13.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 7.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.29%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 20.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
10.59%
Similar net income growth to ORCL's 10.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-6.10%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 5.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.96%
Similar EPS growth to ORCL's 13.64%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
11.11%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ORCL's 11.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.58%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.