503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.12%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 1.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.59%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.85%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 1.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.86%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.57%
R&D growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.96%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
36.75%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-5.07%
Marketing expense reduction while ORCL shows 2.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
76.74%
Similar other expenses growth to ORCL's 90.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
5.10%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.99%
Total costs reduction while ORCL shows 2.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.89%
Interest expense growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.25%
D&A growth 50-75% of ORCL's 18.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-8.89%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 1.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.69%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
217.09%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 25.85%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-11.57%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 0.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.38%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-12.46%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 10.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.60%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.35%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 10.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.39%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.