PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 18.33%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Similar cost growth to ORCL's 5.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 21.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 2.72% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.74%
Similar R&D growth to ORCL's 6.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
12.73%
G&A growth less than half of ORCL's 31.54%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
12.50%
Similar marketing expense growth to ORCL's 15.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
42.50%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
Similar operating expenses growth to ORCL's 11.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.23%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ORCL's 9.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.55%
Similar interest expense growth to ORCL's 6.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-4.48%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 108.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.90%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 41.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 19.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.72%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 33.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 12.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 39.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 17.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 15.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.72%
Net income growth below 50% of ORCL's 44.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.19%
Similar net margin growth to ORCL's 21.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
18.31%
EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 41.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 43.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 1.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.