PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.11%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.41%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.97%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.71%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-13.95%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 0.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-12.49%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-69.57%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 38.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.30%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.81%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.60%
Interest expense growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.66%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.48%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.09%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.62%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.42%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
127.46%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 20.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
43.99%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
245.45%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.97%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.19%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.20%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.55% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.