PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.26%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.22%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 1.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.70%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 1.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.99%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.02%
R&D growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
8.93%
G&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 5.94%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-4.98%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-79.41%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 54.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.90%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.46%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.00%
Interest expense reduction while ORCL shows 12.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.86%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.04%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.46%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 1.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.02%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-28.78%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 41.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.76%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 12.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.62%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ORCL's 11.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-92.13%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 1082.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
217.80%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
227.02%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
217.07%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
215.85%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.09%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.