503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 4.01%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
25.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.53%
Similar gross profit growth to ORCL's 4.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-6.37%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 0.40% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.34%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1.48%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
11.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 3.04%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
142.86%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.14%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 0.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.12%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.39%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.57%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.60%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of ORCL's 5.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-7.08%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 6.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.04%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 13.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.70%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 8.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.60%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ORCL's 9.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 5.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.66%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of ORCL's 60.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-4.58%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.22%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 8.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 7.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.03%
Diluted share increase while ORCL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.