PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.96%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.06%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.15%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-25.54%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-12.60%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
85.12%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.60%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.42%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.78%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.61%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.86%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.27%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.31%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.71%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
439.76%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 173.81%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.60%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.30%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.