PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.11%
Revenue decline while ORCL shows 1.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.19%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.04%
Gross profit decline while ORCL shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.23%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.17%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
13.56%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-0.45%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
84.21%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.88%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.12%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.65%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.86%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 5.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.55%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 7.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.59%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 11.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.57%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 9.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.82%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 9.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 7.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.16%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 1.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.70%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 11.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.73%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 9.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.84%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 14.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.28%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 14.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.