PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.60%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 6.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
12.43%
Cost growth above 1.5x ORCL's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.85%
Similar gross profit growth to ORCL's 8.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-1.61%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 1.48% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.69%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
30.09%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.30%
Marketing expense growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
600.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 4450.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.98%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.70%
Total costs growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.73%
Interest expense growth less than half of ORCL's 26.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.38%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of ORCL's 14.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-3.84%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 11.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.33%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 21.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.85%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 14.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
111.36%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ORCL's 20.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 12.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.17%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 14.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.19%
Net income growth below 50% of ORCL's 21.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.07%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 13.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.96%
EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 24.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 25.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.29%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.