PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.81%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.47%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-1.52%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.29%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.55%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-15.44%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-22.37%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-72.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.50%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.31%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.53%
Interest expense reduction while ORCL shows 1.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.95%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 0.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.64%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.36%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.99%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.77%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.72%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-99.36%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 80.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.59%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.89%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.66%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.88%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.