PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ORCL's 7.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
13.18%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x ORCL's 10.57%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
1.70%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ORCL's 6.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.26%
R&D growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.02%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
67.17%
G&A growth while ORCL reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.79%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ORCL's 1.79%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-22.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.99%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.09%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ORCL's 3.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.00%
Interest expense reduction while ORCL shows 8.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x ORCL's 2.18%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.45%
EBITDA decline while ORCL shows 15.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.77%
EBITDA margin decline while ORCL shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.20%
Operating income decline while ORCL shows 15.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.92%
Operating margin decline while ORCL shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-211.11%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 4.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Pre-tax income decline while ORCL shows 29.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while ORCL shows 20.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.54%
Tax expense reduction while ORCL shows 273.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.44%
Net income decline while ORCL shows 12.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
Net margin decline while ORCL shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
EPS decline while ORCL shows 12.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
Diluted EPS decline while ORCL shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.