PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.21%
Revenue growth below 50% of ORCL's 1.00%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-7.78%
Cost reduction while ORCL shows 2.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.95%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.05%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-29.70%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 9.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
1.25%
Marketing expense growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-144.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.70%
Total costs reduction while ORCL shows 0.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
Interest expense growth less than half of ORCL's 5.96%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.71%
D&A reduction while ORCL shows 4.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.03%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 4.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.25%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 3.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.35%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 2.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
635.00%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.48%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 3.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.24%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 2.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.75%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.41%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 8.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.18%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 7.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.82%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 7.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.36%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 7.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 1.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.