PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.58%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.08%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.49%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.19%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-32.91%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-16.39%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-124.59%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 35.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.02%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.92%
Interest expense growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.21%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.96%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.28%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.89%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.25%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-17.76%
Other expenses reduction while ORCL shows 10.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.34%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.47%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.01%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.36%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.15%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.97% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.