PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.33%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.11%
Cost increase while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.98%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.34%
Margin decline while ORCL shows 4.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.36%
R&D reduction while ORCL shows 3.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-16.12%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of ORCL's 2435.71%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.76%
Operating expenses reduction while ORCL shows 14.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.81%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.98%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.72%
D&A growth while ORCL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.45%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EBITDA margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.98%
Operating margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.07%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x ORCL's 9.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.08%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.44%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.94%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.48%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.16%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.86%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.