PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.62%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ORCL's 0.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
0.55%
Cost growth less than half of ORCL's 2.69%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.66%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.03%
Margin expansion while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.55%
R&D growth while ORCL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-4.72%
G&A reduction while ORCL shows 0.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-3.54%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.23%
Total costs growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
D&A growth 50-75% of ORCL's 40.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
10.67%
Similar EBITDA growth to ORCL's 12.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.98%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to ORCL's 11.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
1.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of ORCL's 3.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.47%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ORCL's 2.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.77%
Other expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.19%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ORCL's 1.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.63%
Tax expense growth less than half of ORCL's 114.23%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.12%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.45%
Net margin growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.10%
EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.12%
Diluted EPS growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while ORCL shows 0.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.