PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.24%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 10.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
20.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.62%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-1.47%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.58%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.53%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.63%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.62%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.59%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.12%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.33%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.53%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.27%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.84%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.05%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.33%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-22.82%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-22.82%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.