PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.39%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.31%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.67%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.81%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.90%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.80%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.33%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.04%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.80%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-7.18%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.60%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.81%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-9.81%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.