503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.19%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 10.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-2.17%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
11.91%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.56%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.20%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.00%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.32%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.70%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.58%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to PANW's 33.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
15.66%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.97%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-526.09%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.79%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.85%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.44%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.42%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-11.42%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.